![]() ![]() #MX300 1TB DISKMARK PORTABLE#Introduction, Packaging, SpecificationsĨ. It is useful for comparing the speed of both portable and local storage devices. I will let you make your own comparisons in our list of budget SSDs in the graphs above.ġ. In general, it traded punches with the 2.5" SATA MX500 with its performance generally in the same ballpark, as expected. Lastly, in 4K QD32 read and write, the MX500 M.2 was faster than both the MX200 and MX300 on both counts. In 4K read and write, the MX500 pulled out way ahead of the MX200, but was only better than the MX300 in the read segment. Looking at the results, the MX500 M.2 was generally better than the MX300 in both sequential and 512K read and write, but it was not necessarily ahead of the MX200 at all times either. DiskMark is a small utility that allows you to benchmark your disks and hard drives performance. Both figures are an improvement over the MX300 though. Its read rating is slightly lower than the MX200, but the write rating is slightly improved. The Crucial MX500 500GB is rated at 95,000 IOPS for read and 90,000 IOPS for write. Crucial MX300 1TB at Amazon for 179.99 (opens in new tab) Sequential Read Performance To read about our storage tests in-depth, please check out How We Test HDDs And SSDs. Looking at the results, the MX500 M.2 was generally better than the MX300 in. The ability of a controller and flash memory to deliver high IOPS will provide huge benefits to the score as well. - Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark About Crystal Disk Mark - Measure. Just a bit of background information higher capacity drives tend to perform a little better in these tests. Select test data (Random, 0Fill, 1Fill)Ĭrystal Disk Mark 3.0 is in the spotlight. It is useful for comparing the speed of both portable and local storage devices. Measure random 512KB, 4KB, 4KB (Queue Depth=32) reads/writes speed ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |